GDT: 4/19/15 Game 3 Vancouver at Calgary

timber09

www.lumberjackcards.com,
Joined
Jan 25, 2008
Messages
6,657
Reaction score
0
Location
Kirkland, WA
Alright folks - series is tied 1-1 which I am guessing most of us guessed would be the case and has reignited a great rivalry.

Here's to another great game - hopefully there are lots of fans on both sides of this thing around so we can have a nice friendly discussion!


As the series shifts to Calgary for Game 3 on Sunday night, the Canucks are trying to take the focus off the unfortunate events that overshadowed their victory. Daniel Sedin, Chris Higgins, Ronalds Kenins and Radim Vrbata scored as Vancouver avoided an NHL-record eighth consecutive home playoff defeat.

"Regardless of what people are talking about, we got a big win," defenseman Kevin Bieksa said. "We got a win where we felt like we outplayed them for the whole game."

The Flames, who in Game 1 earned a 2-1 victory on Kris Russell's goal with 30 seconds remaining, acknowledge that the frustration over their impending defeat boiled over. That doesn't mean they regret how things played out.

"Obviously we weren't happy with the score at the time. We got involved and there was a scrum and it escalated," forward Brandon Bollig said. "You have to send a message somehow. We play a tough game. We're a hard-working team."

Calgary now prepares for the club's first home playoff game since losing Game 6 to Chicago in the first round in 2009. The Flames went 4-0-2 at the Saddledome to end the regular season and snapped a four-game home losing streak to Vancouver with a 3-2 win Feb. 14.

"I don't think any of us are going to back down. Neither team is," Flames forward Matt Stajan said. "We play scrappy. We've got to battle back. That wasn't good enough from our team. We stick together here and we regroup altogether and use our crowd next game and try to get a win."

The Canucks feel like they're ready for anything Calgary throws at them.
"The hard hitting, the stuff at the end (of Game 2), it was like old-time hockey," forward Bo Horvat said. "It was a physical game, nobody was holding back and we are expecting the same thing in Game 3. We're going to have to be prepared."
 
Vrbata with two defensive turnovers on one shift - yikes

2-1 Calgary with five left in the first
 
Countdown until Janik Hansen does something stupid starts now....

I don't think there was any intent by Weber there, Hiller certainly made it look good though.
 
Well good game by the flames. I hope they can last the ruff stuff cause they look a bit smaller than vancouver. But good game by the flames non the less
 
I'm curious if the Burrows instigator (in the last 5 minutes) gets rescinded especially after they rescinded Engelland 48 hours ago. If not, Burrows will be missing Game 4.

Then again, the Canucks don't have the son of their president working in the Department of Player Safety, so who knows.....
 
I'm curious if the Burrows instigator (in the last 5 minutes) gets rescinded especially after they rescinded Engelland 48 hours ago. If not, Burrows will be missing Game 4.

Then again, the Canucks don't have the son of their president working in the Department of Player Safety, so who knows.....

Give me a break. It was rescinded because he didn't deserve it.
 
Canucks were pretty terrible tonight. They were just giving the puck away all night.

Can't condone what Bieksa did at the end of the game. But Hartley has last change, Bieksas out there, so you send out Ferland?! Everybody knows that both aren't going to go quietly.
 
I don't think Burrows deserved the instigator he got in this case either.

Then again Hamhuis could have a meeting tomorrow for his hit - there is certainly the potential that they will be out without Hamhuis and Burrows for game four.
 
The canucks were pissed tonight. I wouldnt be suprised if he is out for game 4. Message from the league to try and calm things down. I could be wrong tho
 
I don't think Burrows deserved the instigator he got in this case either.

Then again Hamhuis could have a meeting tomorrow for his hit - there is certainly the potential that they will be out without Hamhuis and Burrows for game four.

Yah, I could see Hamhuis getting something, but I would hope Ferland would for the hit he placed on Sbisa after Sbisa dumped the puck in as well.
 
Then again, the Canucks don't have the son of their president working in the Department of Player Safety, so who knows.....

And it wouldn't be the first time the NHL uses the input of someone named Burke to decide a fate of a Canuck in the playoffs (when they shouldn't have), right? Maybe they just want to keep up the tradition?

:)
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
389,547
Messages
2,233,529
Members
4,151
Latest member
barchamb13
Back
Top